What’s it take for a girl to make it in the big city? A sense of humor, a sense of self, and a desire to succeed in fashion. A stylish novel for teen PROJECT RUNWAY and DEVIL WEARS PRADA fans.
Kat’s come to New York City with a dream: to be a big fashion designer and to see her name on a label in Bloomingdale’s. Back in upstate New York, she imagined a city paved in Prada . . . but the reality isn’t quite so fashionable. Still, there are friends to be made, boys to be flirted with, and amazements to be found . . . sometimes when she least expects it. Even when her lame hick boyfriend from back home comes to the city to try to reclaim her, Kat knows she’s found her place . . . now all she has to do is have the place find her back.
There was a period in time a few years ago where there was a mini trend of Audrey Hepburn centric YA books. This book actually came out a few years before that trend and I had it, and thought…hmm, maybe it’s actually fairly good to have a mini trend inspired by it.
So after sitting on my shelf for almost ten years-yeah, it’s been that long-I decided to give it a whirl and read it.
I only got through about thirty pages in it. It was that bad. I almost didn’t even bother writing this brief DNF review over it, that’s how disgusted I was over it. But since I haven’t had time much to read something that I I’d like to review in the past couple of weeks and this was the closest book I could think of writing a review for…well, it’s getting this brief “Why Audrey Hepburn Would Be Ashamed She’s On the Cover” type of review.
1) Audrey would not approve of the main character’s nasty attitude:
Seriously, our narrator Junebug/Cat is a POS if there ever was one. She’s rude and nasty to practically every one. For example, she calls her mother a heifer (and yes, she’s not exactly a nice person but still HEIFER) and she pretty much gets in a cat fight with your stereotypical “Mean Girl” at her fucking grandmother’s funeral.
2) Audrey would probably be disgusted that Breakfast at Tiffany’s (the film) is associated with being about Audrey rather than being, you know, a movie.
Yes, I know the movie was one of Audrey’s most iconic roles (though, personally give me Sabrina, Charade, My Fair Lady, Funny Face, or even Roman Holiday any day over Breakfast at Tiffany’s). Yes, the fashion in that movie is fantastic, but there are some scenes (like anytime that Mickey Rooney appears) that I just grimace at. PLUS, it’s completely different than the short story its based on and I think a lot of people forget that when they try to write one of these YA Audrey Hepburn centric books. Did you know that Capote actually had Marilyn Monroe in mind for the role?
Yeah, probably not. I get that it’s easy to blend the two things together because it was an iconic role for Audrey-probably because of that Givenchy dress-BUT the movie is NOT about Audrey. And it seems in all these books pretty much the character is more or less Audrey’s version of Holly Golightly.
3) Audrey would be disgusted with this character’s problems.
Seriously, a “mean mother” and a small town full of assholes is nothing to growing up in WW2 Europe and being forced to eat tulip bulbs. Just saying.
Had I spent more time reading this book, I probably could’ve added more reasons to the list. It boils down to this though, the book suffers from many problems that late 2000’s Post Mean Girls YA books have. The tropes are just noxious. I don’t know why it’s necessary-even these days-to use the Mean Girl trope or for that matter the nasty mother trope.
People are complex. We have are good days and our bad days. This book just depicts everyone at their worst. One of the things I like best about Audrey Hepburn movies is that there is a hopeful optimism to them. This book is devoid of that optimism. It consists of a sullen, unlikeable character whose only resemblance to Hepburn’s character is Breakfast at Tiffany’s is she has a LBD and uses a fake name.
Overall Rating: DNF.